CONFRONTATIONAL POLITICS OF GMA
GMA’S POLITICS FURTHER HEIGHTENS THE RESTIVENESS IN THE AFP AND IN BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS—AN ART WHICH SHE IS GOOD AT.
CASE IN POINT: DISMISSAL OF GUDANI AND BALUTAN
JUSTIFICATION: INSUBORDINATION (VIOLATION OF
ARTICLE OF WAR 65)
>SENATE SEES IT AS A FORM OF DEMORALIZATION OF THE AFP.
PALACE AND AFP HIERARCHY HOWEVER ASSERT THAT IT’S TO UPHOLD THE CHAIN OF COMMAND.
THE CULTURE OF MISTRUST LEADS FURTHER TO POLITICAL ANIMOSITY AS THE SENATE REVIVES THE INQUIRY ABOUT THE AFP’S LINK TO ELECTION FRAUD.
>PALACE SEES IT AS A FORM OF ‘SERIAL IMPEACHMENT’ UNDER THE GUISE OF CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRY IN AID OF LEGISLATION—AN OBVIOUS LACK OF INTEREST OF THE PALACE TO BRING OUT THE TRUTH.
